In the pilot episode of "House MD," Dr. Cameron gets upset at House when he tells her that she was hired because she's attractive. Cameron finds this information insulting, and starts listing off her academic and professional accomplishments--none of which House is particularly impressed with.
Whenever I watched this episode, I always found Cameron's reaction to make sense: she worked hard to get her position on House's team, but was hired for reasons other than what was written on her resume--suggesting that she could have been at the bottom of her class instead of the top and still have gotten hired as long as she looked as pretty as she does--therefore making her efforts somewhat pointless.
But I realized yesterday that Cameron's reaction is logical for a Cameron--someone who is intelligent, hard-working, has good grades, scored the impressive summer internships...all the things that make a successful professional. The people who are capable of putting in the time and effort into being the best would obviously want to be recognized as such. Anything less would be degrading.
I'm not a Cameron, and I figured this out when I asked myself if I would have been upset if House told me I was hired because I'm attractive.
My answer was a definite, "No, not at all." In fact, I would have taken it as a compliment.
Of course, that might set the feminist movement back a couple feet--but I'm only advocating "Pretty + Skinny > Resume" for myself because I'm not as intelligent or hard-working as those who deserve the good jobs, and we all know my grades are less-than-stellar. And as for internships--I've never had one, and probably never will because I'm too lazy to waste my summer working. I am well aware that my bad habits are going to put me in the lower bracket of potential hires for most jobs I apply for, but I'm fine with that...because I am also well aware that I'm not ugly. I think that will at least get me through the final stages of the review process.
I don't think relying on looks rather than accomplishments for job security is a negative thing. It's really no different than the social-whoring people do when they network for people they can use for their advantage: A got the job because she knew someone who knew someone who knew someone; B got the job because she's skinny and knows how to put on makeup. You're an idiot if you don't see the similarity.
The obvious counter to my theory is that it is highly possible that corporate higher-ups are actually looking at the applicant's resume rather than her face--my response is that it's just as likely that the male-dominated working world has more testosterone than professionalism, and will add more points for nice legs than they will subtract for mediocre class ranking. What selfish person wouldn't take advantage of that?
Recent Comments